We have been discussing algorithms, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. The issue in the news that is taking up a lot of attention is ChatGPT. We have written about it before, but the question of its influence on academic journal publishing is useful to consider. On this episode, Dr. Lilian Hill explains how ChatGPT influences academic publishing. Listen to the episode and join in the online forum.
Listen to the Podcast
References
Flanagin, A., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Berkwits, M, & Christiansen, S.L. Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge. JAMA. 2023;329(8):637–639. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344
Getahun, J. (2023, January 16). ChatGPT could be used for good, but like many other AI models, it's rife with racist and discriminatory bias. Insider. Retrieved https://www.insider.com/chatgpt-is-like-many-other-ai-models-rife-with-bias-2023-1
Open AI (2023). ChatGPT (April 10 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature, 613(7945), 620–621. https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2023). Is ChatGPT a valid author? Nurse Education in Practice, 68, 103600. https://doi-org.lynx.lib.usm.edu/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103600
No comments:
Post a Comment